Pilot feedback
Top 20 MVP Pilot Feedback
Top 20 pilot feedback: 19/20 public feedback handoff(s) ready, 1 owner-review gated, 60 reviewer question(s), and live activation gated. This handoff turns first-review notes into owner-review decisions without enabling private EVE data, provider calls, account writes, payments, ads, email, Discord, or feature-flag changes.
One feedback handoff for every priority MVP tool lane.
Feedback lanes ready for public sample review.
Support and protected operations stay gated for owner review.
Three plain-language reviewer questions per tool lane.
Reviewer result, usefulness, polish note, launch risk, and owner gate.
Approve sample, polish, hold activation, or request owner evidence.
OAuth, providers, writes, sends, payments, ads, Discord, and flags stay gated.
Private account, provider, token, evidence, and separate-project details stay excluded.
Browser-Local Feedback Receipt
Record each pilot lane as approve, polish, hold, or owner evidence needed, then copy or download the receipt from this browser. The receipt does not call EVE, providers, Discord, email, ads, payments, feature flags, or the database.
One browser-local decision row for each priority MVP lane.
Public sample feedback accepted for first MVP review.
Samples that need wording, layout, or clarity cleanup.
Lanes that should stay out of wider public preview.
Protected setup or owner-review evidence still required.
Lanes not yet decided in this browser.
Browser-local onlyLive activation gated
#1 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
AI Intel Desk
Review AI Intel Desk with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/intel-desk?sample=gate-camp
- Readiness
- /tool-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did AI Intel Desk produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make AI Intel Desk clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should AI Intel Desk stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: AI Intel Desk can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#2 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Fit Coach
Review Fit Coach with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/fit-coach?sample=budget-vexor
- Readiness
- /tool-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Fit Coach produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Fit Coach clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Fit Coach stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Fit Coach can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#3 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Loss Reviewer
Review Loss Reviewer with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/loss-reviewer?sample=lowsec-bait
- Readiness
- /reports-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Loss Reviewer produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Loss Reviewer clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Loss Reviewer stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Loss Reviewer can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#4 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Appraisal Desk
Review Appraisal Desk with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/appraisal?sample=loot-stack
- Readiness
- /market-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Appraisal Desk produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Appraisal Desk clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Appraisal Desk stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Appraisal Desk can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#5 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Market Command
Review Market Command with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/market?sample=hub-check
- Readiness
- /market-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Market Command produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Market Command clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Market Command stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Market Command can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#6 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Industry Lab
Review Industry Lab with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/industry-ops?sample=doctrine-build
- Readiness
- /industry-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Industry Lab produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Industry Lab clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Industry Lab stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Industry Lab can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#7 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Planetary Industry Planner
Review Planetary Industry Planner with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/pi-ops?sample=p2-factory-chain
- Readiness
- /pi-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Planetary Industry Planner produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Planetary Industry Planner clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Planetary Industry Planner stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Planetary Industry Planner can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#8 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Trade Route Screener
Review Trade Route Screener with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/market?sample=hub-check
- Readiness
- /market-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Trade Route Screener produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Trade Route Screener clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Trade Route Screener stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Trade Route Screener can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#9 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Route And System Risk Tools
Review Route And System Risk Tools with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/hauling-ops
- Readiness
- /navigation
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Route And System Risk Tools produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Route And System Risk Tools clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Route And System Risk Tools stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Route And System Risk Tools can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#10 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup
Review Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /profiles
- Readiness
- /data-rights
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#11 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow
Review SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/srp-ops?sample=doctrine-loss
- Readiness
- /srp-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#12 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Fleet And Timer Operations
Review Fleet And Timer Operations with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/fleet-ops?sample=armor-timer
- Readiness
- /fleet-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Fleet And Timer Operations produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Fleet And Timer Operations clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Fleet And Timer Operations stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Fleet And Timer Operations can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#13 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Buyback Request Workflow
Review Buyback Request Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/appraisal?sample=loot-stack
- Readiness
- /buyback-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Buyback Request Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Buyback Request Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Buyback Request Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Buyback Request Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#14 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Mining Ledger Workflow
Review Mining Ledger Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/mining-ops?sample=moon-pull
- Readiness
- /alliance-ops-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Mining Ledger Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Mining Ledger Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Mining Ledger Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Mining Ledger Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#15 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Recruitment And HR Application Workflow
Review Recruitment And HR Application Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/recruiting-ops?sample=line-member
- Readiness
- /recruitment-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Recruitment And HR Application Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Recruitment And HR Application Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Recruitment And HR Application Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Recruitment And HR Application Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#16 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Access And Permission Request Workflow
Review Access And Permission Request Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/alliance-ops?sample=access-srp
- Readiness
- /access-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Access And Permission Request Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Access And Permission Request Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Access And Permission Request Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Access And Permission Request Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#17 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Wormhole Mapper
Review Wormhole Mapper with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/wormhole-ops?sample=chain-review
- Readiness
- /wormhole-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Wormhole Mapper produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Wormhole Mapper clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Wormhole Mapper stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Wormhole Mapper can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#18 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Structure And Timer Watch
Review Structure And Timer Watch with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/structure-ops?sample=armor-timer
- Readiness
- /corp-command-reviewer
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Structure And Timer Watch produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Structure And Timer Watch clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Structure And Timer Watch stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Structure And Timer Watch can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#19 / Pending / Public Feedback Ready
Corp And Character Audit Shells
Review Corp And Character Audit Shells with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample
- /tools/recruiting-ops?sample=line-member
- Readiness
- /permissions-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Corp And Character Audit Shells produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Corp And Character Audit Shells clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Corp And Character Audit Shells stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Corp And Character Audit Shells can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
#20 / Pending / Owner Review Gated Feedback
Support And Protected Ops Review
Review Support And Protected Ops Review as a gated support/protected-operations lane only; record clarity feedback without sending messages, creating payment links, approving account actions, or exposing protected queue details.
- Sample
- /support
- Readiness
- /support-readiness
- Decision
- Pending
- Did Support And Protected Ops Review produce useful MVP guidance without entering private account, support, payment, or provider details?
- What one change would make Support And Protected Ops Review clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Support And Protected Ops Review stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Handoff: Support And Protected Ops Review can collect public clarity feedback, but protected owner evidence remains required before any live action or private workflow is exposed.
- Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
Group 1 / 4/4 public ready
Public Intel And Appraisal Polish
Refresh AI Intel Desk, Fit Coach, Loss Reviewer, and Appraisal Desk first because they are the highest-demand public entry tools.
- Items
- 4
- Questions
- 12
- Fields
- 20/20
- Decisions
- 16/16
Group 2 / 4/4 public ready
Market Industry And Trade Proof
Tighten Market Command, Industry Lab, PI Planner, and Trade Route proof while private wallet, asset, and provider reads stay excluded.
- Items
- 4
- Questions
- 12
- Fields
- 20/20
- Decisions
- 16/16
Group 3 / 4/4 public ready
Navigation Profiles Fleet And SRP
Recheck route/system risk, public profiles, SRP proof, and fleet/timer operations with public-safe smoke and rollback labels.
- Items
- 4
- Questions
- 12
- Fields
- 20/20
- Decisions
- 16/16
Group 4 / 4/4 public ready
Alliance Intake Workflows
Refresh buyback, mining, recruitment, and access workflows before protected owner review and provider activation.
- Items
- 4
- Questions
- 12
- Fields
- 20/20
- Decisions
- 16/16
Group 5 / 3/4 public ready
Ops Audit And Support Gates
Refresh wormhole, structure, corp/character audit, and support review proof while owner-evidence and provider gates stay closed.
- Items
- 4
- Questions
- 12
- Fields
- 20/20
- Decisions
- 16/16
#1 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
AI Intel Desk
Review AI Intel Desk with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/intel-desk?sample=gate-camp
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did AI Intel Desk produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make AI Intel Desk clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should AI Intel Desk stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for AI Intel Desk.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#2 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Fit Coach
Review Fit Coach with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/fit-coach?sample=budget-vexor
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Fit Coach produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Fit Coach clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Fit Coach stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Fit Coach.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#3 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Loss Reviewer
Review Loss Reviewer with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/loss-reviewer?sample=lowsec-bait
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Loss Reviewer produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Loss Reviewer clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Loss Reviewer stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Loss Reviewer.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#4 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Appraisal Desk
Review Appraisal Desk with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/appraisal?sample=loot-stack
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Appraisal Desk produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Appraisal Desk clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Appraisal Desk stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Appraisal Desk.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#5 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Market Command
Review Market Command with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/market?sample=hub-check
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Market Command produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Market Command clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Market Command stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Market Command.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#6 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Industry Lab
Review Industry Lab with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/industry-ops?sample=doctrine-build
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Industry Lab produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Industry Lab clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Industry Lab stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Industry Lab.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#7 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Planetary Industry Planner
Review Planetary Industry Planner with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/pi-ops?sample=p2-factory-chain
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Planetary Industry Planner produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Planetary Industry Planner clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Planetary Industry Planner stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Planetary Industry Planner.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#8 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Trade Route Screener
Review Trade Route Screener with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/market?sample=hub-check
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Trade Route Screener produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Trade Route Screener clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Trade Route Screener stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Trade Route Screener.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#9 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Route And System Risk Tools
Review Route And System Risk Tools with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/hauling-ops
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Route And System Risk Tools produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Route And System Risk Tools clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Route And System Risk Tools stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Route And System Risk Tools.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#10 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup
Review Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /profiles
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#11 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow
Review SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/srp-ops?sample=doctrine-loss
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#12 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Fleet And Timer Operations
Review Fleet And Timer Operations with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/fleet-ops?sample=armor-timer
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Fleet And Timer Operations produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Fleet And Timer Operations clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Fleet And Timer Operations stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Fleet And Timer Operations.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#13 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Buyback Request Workflow
Review Buyback Request Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/appraisal?sample=loot-stack
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Buyback Request Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Buyback Request Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Buyback Request Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Buyback Request Workflow.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#14 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Mining Ledger Workflow
Review Mining Ledger Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/mining-ops?sample=moon-pull
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Mining Ledger Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Mining Ledger Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Mining Ledger Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Mining Ledger Workflow.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#15 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Recruitment And HR Application Workflow
Review Recruitment And HR Application Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/recruiting-ops?sample=line-member
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Recruitment And HR Application Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Recruitment And HR Application Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Recruitment And HR Application Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Recruitment And HR Application Workflow.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#16 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Access And Permission Request Workflow
Review Access And Permission Request Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/alliance-ops?sample=access-srp
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Access And Permission Request Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Access And Permission Request Workflow clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Access And Permission Request Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Access And Permission Request Workflow.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#17 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Wormhole Mapper
Review Wormhole Mapper with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/wormhole-ops?sample=chain-review
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Wormhole Mapper produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Wormhole Mapper clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Wormhole Mapper stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Wormhole Mapper.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#18 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Structure And Timer Watch
Review Structure And Timer Watch with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/structure-ops?sample=armor-timer
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Structure And Timer Watch produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Structure And Timer Watch clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Structure And Timer Watch stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Structure And Timer Watch.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#19 / Public Feedback Ready / 5/5
Corp And Character Audit Shells
Review Corp And Character Audit Shells with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff.
- Sample Route
- /tools/recruiting-ops?sample=line-member
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Corp And Character Audit Shells produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output?
- What one change would make Corp And Character Audit Shells clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Corp And Character Audit Shells stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Corp And Character Audit Shells.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Public launch note: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
#20 / Owner Review Gated Feedback / 5/5
Support And Protected Ops Review
Review Support And Protected Ops Review as a gated support/protected-operations lane only; record clarity feedback without sending messages, creating payment links, approving account actions, or exposing protected queue details.
- Sample Route
- /support
- Questions
- 3
- Decisions
- 4/4
- Rollback
- Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails.
- Did Support And Protected Ops Review produce useful MVP guidance without entering private account, support, payment, or provider details?
- What one change would make Support And Protected Ops Review clearer for a first reviewer?
- Should Support And Protected Ops Review stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated?
- Reviewer result: Record pass, needs polish, or hold for Support And Protected Ops Review.
- Sample usefulness: Describe whether the public-safe sample was understandable and useful.
- Polish note: Capture one plain-language improvement without private data.
- Launch risk: Note any reason wider public preview should wait.
- Owner-review evidence needed: Keep protected evidence values out of the public handoff.
ready
Approve public sample
Marks the sample as useful for public MVP review only; it does not enable live provider or account actions.
ready
Polish before wider launch
Routes the lane back to copy, usability, or sample-output cleanup without changing feature flags.
ready
Hold live activation
Keeps OAuth, private EVE data, provider calls, sends, payments, ads, Discord actions, and database writes gated.
ready
Needs owner evidence
Requires protected owner-review proof outside public pages before any private or provider-backed step moves forward.
Pilot Feedback Packet
This packet gives the project owner a public-safe reviewer handoff with questions, fields, decision labels, and rollbacks.
# WarpIntel Top 20 MVP Pilot Feedback Top 20 pilot feedback: 19/20 public feedback handoff(s) ready, 1 owner-review gated, 60 reviewer question(s), and live activation gated. ## Summary - Feedback items: 20 - Public feedback ready: 19 - Owner-review gated feedback items: 1 - Feedback groups: 5 - Reviewer questions: 60 - Handoff fields: 100/100 - Decision options: 80/80 - Browser-local receipt actions: 3 - Browser-local receipt boundaries: 5 - Sample routes: 20 - Rollbacks: 20 - Live activation ready: no ## Feedback Groups ### 1. Public Intel And Appraisal Polish - Feedback items: 4 - Public feedback ready: 4 - Owner-review gated: 0 - Questions: 12 - Handoff fields: 20/20 - Decisions: 16/16 ### 2. Market Industry And Trade Proof - Feedback items: 4 - Public feedback ready: 4 - Owner-review gated: 0 - Questions: 12 - Handoff fields: 20/20 - Decisions: 16/16 ### 3. Navigation Profiles Fleet And SRP - Feedback items: 4 - Public feedback ready: 4 - Owner-review gated: 0 - Questions: 12 - Handoff fields: 20/20 - Decisions: 16/16 ### 4. Alliance Intake Workflows - Feedback items: 4 - Public feedback ready: 4 - Owner-review gated: 0 - Questions: 12 - Handoff fields: 20/20 - Decisions: 16/16 ### 5. Ops Audit And Support Gates - Feedback items: 4 - Public feedback ready: 3 - Owner-review gated: 1 - Questions: 12 - Handoff fields: 20/20 - Decisions: 16/16 ## Feedback Items ### 1. AI Intel Desk - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/intel-desk?sample=gate-camp - Readiness route: /tool-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review AI Intel Desk with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: AI Intel Desk can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did AI Intel Desk produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make AI Intel Desk clearer for a first reviewer? / Should AI Intel Desk stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 2. Fit Coach - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/fit-coach?sample=budget-vexor - Readiness route: /tool-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Fit Coach with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Fit Coach can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Fit Coach produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Fit Coach clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Fit Coach stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 3. Loss Reviewer - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/loss-reviewer?sample=lowsec-bait - Readiness route: /reports-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Loss Reviewer with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Loss Reviewer can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Loss Reviewer produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Loss Reviewer clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Loss Reviewer stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 4. Appraisal Desk - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/appraisal?sample=loot-stack - Readiness route: /market-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Appraisal Desk with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Appraisal Desk can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Appraisal Desk produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Appraisal Desk clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Appraisal Desk stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 5. Market Command - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/market?sample=hub-check - Readiness route: /market-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Market Command with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Market Command can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Market Command produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Market Command clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Market Command stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 6. Industry Lab - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/industry-ops?sample=doctrine-build - Readiness route: /industry-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Industry Lab with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Industry Lab can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Industry Lab produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Industry Lab clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Industry Lab stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 7. Planetary Industry Planner - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/pi-ops?sample=p2-factory-chain - Readiness route: /pi-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Planetary Industry Planner with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Planetary Industry Planner can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Planetary Industry Planner produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Planetary Industry Planner clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Planetary Industry Planner stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 8. Trade Route Screener - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/market?sample=hub-check - Readiness route: /market-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Trade Route Screener with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Trade Route Screener can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Trade Route Screener produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Trade Route Screener clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Trade Route Screener stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 9. Route And System Risk Tools - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/hauling-ops - Readiness route: /navigation - Reviewer instruction: Review Route And System Risk Tools with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Route And System Risk Tools can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Route And System Risk Tools produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Route And System Risk Tools clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Route And System Risk Tools stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 10. Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /profiles - Readiness route: /data-rights - Reviewer instruction: Review Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Public Profiles And Corp/Alliance Lookup stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 11. SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/srp-ops?sample=doctrine-loss - Readiness route: /srp-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow clearer for a first reviewer? / Should SRP Proof And Reviewer Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 12. Fleet And Timer Operations - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/fleet-ops?sample=armor-timer - Readiness route: /fleet-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Fleet And Timer Operations with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Fleet And Timer Operations can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Fleet And Timer Operations produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Fleet And Timer Operations clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Fleet And Timer Operations stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 13. Buyback Request Workflow - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/appraisal?sample=loot-stack - Readiness route: /buyback-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Buyback Request Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Buyback Request Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Buyback Request Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Buyback Request Workflow clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Buyback Request Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 14. Mining Ledger Workflow - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/mining-ops?sample=moon-pull - Readiness route: /alliance-ops-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Mining Ledger Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Mining Ledger Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Mining Ledger Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Mining Ledger Workflow clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Mining Ledger Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 15. Recruitment And HR Application Workflow - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/recruiting-ops?sample=line-member - Readiness route: /recruitment-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Recruitment And HR Application Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Recruitment And HR Application Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Recruitment And HR Application Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Recruitment And HR Application Workflow clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Recruitment And HR Application Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 16. Access And Permission Request Workflow - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/alliance-ops?sample=access-srp - Readiness route: /access-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Access And Permission Request Workflow with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Access And Permission Request Workflow can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Access And Permission Request Workflow produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Access And Permission Request Workflow clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Access And Permission Request Workflow stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 17. Wormhole Mapper - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/wormhole-ops?sample=chain-review - Readiness route: /wormhole-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Wormhole Mapper with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Wormhole Mapper can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Wormhole Mapper produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Wormhole Mapper clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Wormhole Mapper stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 18. Structure And Timer Watch - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/structure-ops?sample=armor-timer - Readiness route: /corp-command-reviewer - Reviewer instruction: Review Structure And Timer Watch with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Structure And Timer Watch can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Structure And Timer Watch produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Structure And Timer Watch clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Structure And Timer Watch stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 19. Corp And Character Audit Shells - Feedback state: public-feedback-ready - Sample route: /tools/recruiting-ops?sample=line-member - Readiness route: /permissions-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Corp And Character Audit Shells with its public sample route, record pass or needs-polish feedback, and keep private EVE data, credentials, and provider screenshots out of the handoff. - Handoff summary: Corp And Character Audit Shells can move through public sample feedback, polish decision, rollback label, and owner-review handoff without activating live external services. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Corp And Character Audit Shells produce useful MVP guidance using only the public sample output? / What one change would make Corp And Character Audit Shells clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Corp And Character Audit Shells stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Public launch note - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ### 20. Support And Protected Ops Review - Feedback state: owner-review-gated-feedback - Sample route: /support - Readiness route: /support-readiness - Reviewer instruction: Review Support And Protected Ops Review as a gated support/protected-operations lane only; record clarity feedback without sending messages, creating payment links, approving account actions, or exposing protected queue details. - Handoff summary: Support And Protected Ops Review can collect public clarity feedback, but protected owner evidence remains required before any live action or private workflow is exposed. - Rollback: Keep the lane in public preview and update the sample before live activation if this acceptance check fails. - Questions: Did Support And Protected Ops Review produce useful MVP guidance without entering private account, support, payment, or provider details? / What one change would make Support And Protected Ops Review clearer for a first reviewer? / Should Support And Protected Ops Review stay public-preview ready, move to polish, or remain owner-review gated? - Fields: Reviewer result / Sample usefulness / Polish note / Launch risk / Owner-review evidence needed - Decisions: Approve public sample / Polish before wider launch / Hold live activation / Needs owner evidence ## Boundaries - uses only public pilot labels, sample routes, reviewer prompts, decision labels, rollback labels, and no-action safety booleans - keeps protected owner evidence values, account records, support message bodies, private EVE data, provider console details, tokens, credentials, private logs, and separate-project details excluded - does not start OAuth, call EVE or CCP, call providers, write databases, save account reports, send email, create payment links, register Discord commands, load ads, flip feature flags, or mutate external services - treats reviewer feedback as a handoff packet only and does not approve live automation, protected account saves, payments, support sends, or provider activation - keeps the support and protected operations lane owner-review gated until private setup evidence is completed outside public pages ## No-Secret Rule Top 20 MVP Pilot Feedback exposes public pilot labels, sample routes, reviewer prompts, handoff field labels, decision labels, rollback labels, and no-action safety booleans only. It does not expose protected owner evidence values, account records, support message bodies, private EVE data, provider console details, private logs, tokens, credentials, separate-project details, or secrets, and it does not start OAuth, call EVE or CCP, call providers, write databases, save account reports, send email, create payment links, register Discord commands, load ads, flip feature flags, approve launch, or mutate external services.
Boundary 1
No-Action Rule
uses only public pilot labels, sample routes, reviewer prompts, decision labels, rollback labels, and no-action safety booleans
Boundary 2
No-Action Rule
keeps protected owner evidence values, account records, support message bodies, private EVE data, provider console details, tokens, credentials, private logs, and separate-project details excluded
Boundary 3
No-Action Rule
does not start OAuth, call EVE or CCP, call providers, write databases, save account reports, send email, create payment links, register Discord commands, load ads, flip feature flags, or mutate external services
Boundary 4
No-Action Rule
treats reviewer feedback as a handoff packet only and does not approve live automation, protected account saves, payments, support sends, or provider activation
Boundary 5
No-Action Rule
keeps the support and protected operations lane owner-review gated until private setup evidence is completed outside public pages
No-Secret Feedback Rule
Top 20 MVP Pilot Feedback exposes public pilot labels, sample routes, reviewer prompts, handoff field labels, decision labels, rollback labels, and no-action safety booleans only. It does not expose protected owner evidence values, account records, support message bodies, private EVE data, provider console details, private logs, tokens, credentials, separate-project details, or secrets, and it does not start OAuth, call EVE or CCP, call providers, write databases, save account reports, send email, create payment links, register Discord commands, load ads, flip feature flags, approve launch, or mutate external services.